Log inSign up
Eragon
33 posts
user avatar
Eragon
@EragonAI
The AI Operating System For Work
San Francisco
eragon.ai
Joined September 2025
12
Following
663
Followers

New to X?

Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!

Create account

By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, including Cookie Use.

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·US TIDA·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
People on X are the first to know.
Log inSign up
  • Eragon reposted
    user avatar
    AgentMail (YC S25)
    @agentmail
    Jul 1
    @EragonAI agents just got their own inbox, powered by AgentMail! They read email, pull what matters, and run the workflow. When something sensitive comes up, they email you to approve. Link in comments to learn more
    768
  • user avatar
    Eragon
    @EragonAI
    Jul 1
    Eragon agents now have their own email inbox through @agentmail Email lands → agent reads it → kicks off the workflow → emails you for approval before anything sensitive happens.
    1.5K
  • Eragon reposted
    user avatar
    Rishabh Tiwari
    @rish2k1
    Jun 20
    Article cover image
    Article
    Why On-Policy Distillation Works and Naive Self-Distillation Doesn't
    A dense training signal that points in the wrong direction. Authors: @rish2k1 @KushaSareen @Devvrit_Khatri @LakshyAAAgrawal @KurtKeutzer @matei_zaharia @inderjit_ml @agarwl_ TL;DR Reinforcement...
    140K
  • user avatar
    Eragon
    @EragonAI
    Jun 16
    Most enterprise AI fails not because models are bad — but because deployment is. Our 3 bets on what actually drives ROI: → Memory > raw intelligence → Right model for the task > one frontier model for everything → Forward-deployed engineers > plug-and-play platforms Read our
    173
    user avatar
    Eragon
    @EragonAI
    Jun 16
    3 Thesis on AI Agents
    From eragon.ai
    151
  • Eragon reposted
    user avatar
    Aaron Wang
    @authenticdasein
    Jun 9
    Kinda crazy that @EragonAI just navigated through the entire DoorDash page via browser use and ordered us our favorite Oren's Hummus 😎🤑
    00:00
    1.5K
  • user avatar
    Eragon
    @EragonAI
    May 31
    2/ A core issue with parameter-only RL is that it forces task-specific learning into the model weights. Traditional RL can improve model performance on the current task, but it also tends to shift behavior away from the base model, increase forgetting and reduce plasticity. On
    246
  • user avatar
    Eragon
    @EragonAI
    May 31
    4/ This reframes post-training. The default view treats adaptation as one channel — push every improvement into the weights — and pays for it with forgetting, eroded generality, and lost plasticity. FST splits that into two channels that co-evolve: task-specific nuance lives in
    Eragon | Careers
    From eragon.ai
    196
  • user avatar
    Eragon
    @EragonAI
    May 30
    3/ FST beats RL-only across four axes: - Data efficiency: FST reaches RL's running peak in substantially fewer optimizer steps — 3.0× fewer on CodeIO, 1.4× on Math (Polaris), and 3.0× on HoVer-hard — and continuing past the crossover, FST's running peak also exceeds RL's on all
    154
  • Eragon reposted
    user avatar
    Josh Sirota
    @joshua_sirota
    May 29
    Replying to @joshua_sirota
    How FST Works: To leverage the strong in-context learning of current LLMs, we treat the context as "fast weights" and model parameters as "slow weights", drawing from a rich literature in classic ML
    827
  • Eragon reposted
    user avatar
    Josh Sirota
    @joshua_sirota
    May 29
    Announcing Fast-Slow Training (FST) pairing "slow" weights with "fast" context. We try to answer the question, can LLMs adapt continually without losing base skills? FST vs RL: - 3x more sample-efficient -Higher performance ceiling - Less KL drift - Continual learning: succeeds
    1.2K
  • Eragon reposted
    user avatar
    Dave Anderson
    @MrDaveAllen
    May 28
    Excited to share our first research paper Learning, Fast and Slow: Towards LLMs That Adapt Continually. Fast-Slow Training (FST) combines optimized context with model weight updates. Read more here: arxiv.org/pdf/2605.12484
    user avatar
    Eragon
    @EragonAI
    May 28
    1/ At Eragon, we’re building an AI operating system that connects a company’s entire tech stack into a single interface for work, powered by a model post-trained on the customer’s own data so it understands the company’s unique context. We believe that AI system post-training
    00:00
    755
  • user avatar
    Eragon
    @EragonAI
    May 28
    1/ At Eragon, we’re building an AI operating system that connects a company’s entire tech stack into a single interface for work, powered by a model post-trained on the customer’s own data so it understands the company’s unique context. We believe that AI system post-training
    00:00
    5.6K
    user avatar
    Eragon
    @EragonAI
    May 28
    Shoutout to researchers from @UCBerkeley @Mila_Quebec @UTAustin @periodiclabs and Mirendil on this collaboration!
    503
  • user avatar
    Eragon
    @EragonAI
    May 28
    Replying to @EragonAI
    3/ FST beats RL-only across four axes: - Data efficiency: FST reaches RL's running peak in substantially fewer optimizer steps — 3.0× fewer on CodeIO, 1.4× on Math (Polaris), and 3.0× on HoVer-hard — and continuing past the crossover, FST's running peak also exceeds RL's on all
    538
    user avatar
    Eragon
    @EragonAI
    May 28
    4/ This reframes post-training. The default view treats adaptation as one channel — push every improvement into the weights — and pays for it with forgetting, eroded generality, and lost plasticity. FST splits that into two channels that co-evolve: task-specific nuance lives in
    Eragon | Careers
    From eragon.ai
    426
ZW5kZW5yYWhheXU5QGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==