Is Threadplane safe?
Threadplane scores 83.8/100 (Grade A), ranked #32 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types).
The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance;
OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.8/10;
99% of recent commits are signed;
last pushed 2026-07-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
Quick Trust Read
Verdict
Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.
83.8/100 · Grade A
Strongest Signal
Identity / Provenance
18.0/18
Weakest Signal
Adoption
8.6/20
What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-06-20
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-06-19
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #40
Maintainer Checklist
Keep signals currentTrust posture is already in a healthy range. The main job is to keep provenance, maintenance, and public evidence fresh.
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-07-13 09:00 UTC·Repo last pushed yesterday
Rank Trend
2026-07-052026-07-13
Activity & Reach
Stars
103
Forks
11
Last Push
2026-07-12
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
174
Downloads (7d)
657
npm+pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼3
was #29
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions
83.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
22.2 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
18.0 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
15.1 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
19.9 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
8.6 / 20
Activity Inputs
67.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
12.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.0 / 20
Supply Chain Trust
Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
7.8 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Jul 13, 2026
Signed Commits
99%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts10
Branch-Protection3
CI-Tests10
CII-Best-Practices5
Code-Review9
Contributors3
Dangerous-Workflow10
Dependency-Update-Tool10
Fuzzing0
License10
Maintained10
Packaging10
Pinned-Dependencies7
SAST10
Security-Policy10
Signed-Releases10
Token-Permissions10
Vulnerabilities0
Is Threadplane safe?
Public supply-chain signals for Threadplane are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Threadplane carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does Threadplane publish package provenance?
Yes. Threadplane's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Threadplane have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Threadplane has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Threadplane actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Threadplane use?
Threadplane ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Threadplane's commits signed?
99% of the last 100 commits to Threadplane are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Credential signal:
No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
2 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
browser
database
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
medium confidence
Partial
Some package metadata matches; some source metadata is missing
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live
Maintain Threadplane?
HVTrust scores Threadplane from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
